This article is authored by Nidhi Bajaj, of Guru Nanak Dev University, Punjab. The article discusses important provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 including objectives of the Act, right to information and obligations of public authorities, constitution of Information Commissions, powers and functions of Information Commissions, appeal and penalties etc.
Table of Contents
Every citizen of India has a right to free speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. This right does not only cover the communication of information but also the receipt of information since without adequate information, a person cannot form an informed opinion. Thus, the right to know and seek information is an integral part of the fundamental right enshrined under Article 19(1)(a). The Hon’ble Supreme Court has also held that the right of the citizens to know, and to receive information regarding matters of public concern is a fundamental right flowing from Article 19(1)(a).
The right of a citizen to question the government on its various policies and measures forms the very essence of a democracy. In order to exercise this right and to hold the government accountable for its actions, the people must have access to the information regarding the affairs of the government. This is what RTI does. It informs the citizen regarding the affairs of the government and thereby ensures the active participation of a citizen in the working of the democracy at all times and not just once during voting. RTI is an index to measure the growth and development of a country.
In this article, the author has discussed the important provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 which sets out the practical regime for implementation of right to information in India.
The first central legislation dealing with the right to information in India, namely, the Freedom of Information Act, 2002 was passed on December 4, 2002, but was not notified. In 2004, the UPA (United Progressive Alliance) government appointed a National Advisory Council (NAC) which had recommended some changes in the Freedom of Information Act, 2002.
The amended act known as “The Right to Information Act, 2005” was passed on 11th May 2005 and 12th May 2005 by the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha respectively. The President of India gave his assent to the Act on 15th June 2005 and it came into force on 12th October 2005.
The objectives of the RTI Act, 2005 are as follows:
Section 2 of the RTI act, 2005 defines various important terms, some of which are dealt with as follows:
Section 2(a) of the Act provides for the definition of “appropriate government”. Appropriate government means the government in relation to a public authority dealing with the right to information. Such authority is established, constituted, owned, controlled or substantially financed by the Central Government, union territory administration or the State Governments.
Thus, in case of a public authority associated with the central government/union territory administration in the aforesaid manner, the appropriate government is the ‘Central Government’. Whereas, in the case of a public authority associated with the state government in the ways mentioned above, the appropriate government is the ‘State Government’.
Section 2(e) of the Act provides for ‘competent authority’. Competent authority is the authority in charge of the autonomous institutions functioning under the provisions of the Constitution. Such authority has the ultimate responsibility for the enforcement of the RTI Act in those institutions. For example, in the case of the Supreme Court of India, the Chief Justice of India is the competent authority. Competent authority means:
Section 2(f) provides for the kinds of information which can be accessed under the right to information. Information means any material in any form including:
Section 2(h) defines “public authority”. Public authority is an authority or body or institution of self-government which is directly or indirectly related to the government. Such authority may be related to the government in any of the following ways:
The public authority also includes:
directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate government.
As provided under Section 2(i) of the Act, a record may include any:
Manuscript: It may denote the original form of a handwritten document, map or drawing.
File: Collection of papers or connected documents on a particular subject.
Section 2(j) defines “right to information”. It means the right to obtain the information accessible under the RTI Act which is held by or is under the control of any public authority. Such right includes:
This refers to the right to look and scrutinise closely the documents, works and records. Here, no document or its copy is obtained in any form and the information is simply seen and scrutinised.
Taking notes or extracts means noting down certain information from the documents. Here, important information is noted down from the documents and even original extracts from the documents can also be copied. The right also permits the taking of certified copies of documents or records.
A citizen has a right to obtain certified samples of material purchased or used by the government.
Where the information sought is stored in a computer or any other electronic device, the RTI Act permits the citizen to obtain information in electronic form such as in the form of tapes, video cassettes, floppies, diskettes etc or in the form of printouts as well.
Section 3 of the Act provides for the right of the citizens to obtain information subject to the provisions of the Act.
Section 4(1) lists the following obligations of public authorities:
Section 4(2) provides for the obligation of the public authority to make efforts for providing information suo moto to the public at regular intervals using various modes of communication.
Section 4(3) provides for wide dissemination of information in a manner that is easily accessible to the public.
Section 4(4) provides that the dissemination of information has to be done after considering the following factors:
Section 6(1) provides for the manner of making a request by a person who desires to obtain any information under this Act.
The proviso to Section 6(1) deals with a case where the applicant has made an oral request for information. It states that where a person cannot make a written request, the CPIO/SPIO shall assist such person to reduce his request in writing.
As per Section 6(2), a person seeking information under the Act need not disclose any reason for such request or his personal details except such information that might be required for contacting him.
Section 6(3) deals with the case where an application is made to a public authority requesting information that is held by another public authority, or the subject matter of which is more closely related with the functions of another public authority. In this case, the public authority to whom the application is filed must transfer the application, or the concerned portion of it, to that other public authority and notify the applicant of the transfer as soon as possible. The section provides for a maximum of five days for transferring the application.
Section 7(1) provides for expeditious disposal of the request for information by the CPIO/SPIO. The CPIO/SPIO shall within thirty days of receiving the request, either:
Thus, a 30 day period is provided for responding to the request.
An additional period of five days is allowed in computing the period for response in the following cases:
Also, the information sought has to be provided within 48 hours of receiving the request where the said information concerns the life and liberty of a person.
Section 7(2) provides that the failure of the CPIO/SPIO to decide on the request for information within the prescribed period shall be deemed as a refusal of the request.
Section 7(3) deals with the case where the applicant is required to pay a further/additional fee. The sub-section states that where a decision is made to provide information on payment of any further fee representing the cost of providing the information, the CPIO/SPIO shall send an intimation regarding the same to the person making the request. Such intimation must provide to the applicant:-
Section 7(8) deals with the rejection of requests for information. In case, the CPIO/SPIO rejects a request, he is required to communicate the following particulars to the applicant:
Section 7(9) provides that generally, the information asked for under the Act has to be provided in the form in which it is sought, except where:
Section 8(1) lists the categories/types of information which is exempted from disclosure under the RTI Act. There is no obligation to disclose such information to any citizen. The categories of information so exempted include:
Regardless of anything in the Official Secrets Act of 1923 or the permissible exclusions under sub-section (1), a public authority may allow access to information if the public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to protected interests.
Section 9 provides that a CPIO/SPIO may reject a request for information where it would lead to infringement of copyright owned by a person other than the State.
Section 10 provides that if a request for access to information is denied because the disclosure of the information is prohibited by the Act, access may be granted to that part of the record:
Thus, Section 10 deals with the furnishing of information after severance of non-exempt information from the information that is exempted.
Section 10(2) states that when access is granted to a part of a record under sub-section (1), then the CPIO/SPIO shall give notice to the applicant, informing him:
Section 11 contains the provision regarding the disclosure of information related to a third party.
Such written notice has to be given within five days of the receipt of the request. The notice shall:
Such submission shall be taken into consideration while taking a decision regarding the disclosure of information.
The proviso to Section 11(1) states that such disclosure may be permitted if the public interest in disclosure outweighs in importance any possible harm or injury to the interests of such a third party. However, the proviso shall not be applicable to trade or commercial secrets protected by law.
Information Commissions constituted under the RTI Act are the supreme authority and the highest decision-making body under the Act. Information Commissions have been constituted at both the central and state level, known as Central Information Commission(CIC) and State Information Commission(SIC) respectively.
Sections 12-14 of the Act contain the provisions regarding the constitution, membership, etc. of the Central Information Commission, whereas, Sections 15-17 deal with the provisions relating to the State Information Commission.
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (CIC) | STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION (SIC) | |
Constitution | SECTION 12 Constituted by: Central Government. Membership: CIC consists of the following members:-Chief Information CommissionerCentral Information Commissioners(Maximum no. of Central Information Commissioners is 10.) Who shall appoint the members of Commission: President on the recommendation of a Committee consisting of:Prime Minister(Chairperson of the Committee)Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha; andA Union Cabinet Minister nominated by the Prime Minister. Role and responsibilities of the Chief Information Commissioner:Power of general superintendence and direction and management of the affairs of CIC. The Chief Information Commissioner shall be assisted by the Information Commissioners.He has the authority to exercise all the powers and do all acts which may be exercised or done by the CIC. Qualification of members: The Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioner shall be persons of eminence in public life with wide knowledge and experience in law, science, technology, social service, management, journalism, mass media, or administration and governance. Prohibition on membership: The Chief Information Commissioner and the Information Commissioners shall not: be an MP or MLA, orhold any other office of profit or connected with any political party or engage in any business or profession. Headquarters: The headquarters of CIC shall be in Delhi. However, the CIC may establish offices at other places in India after taking approval from the Central Government. | SECTION 15 Constituted by: State Government. Membership: SIC consists of the following members:-State Chief Information CommissionerState Information Commissioners (Maximum no. of State Information Commissioners is 10.) Who appoints the members of the Commission: Governor on the recommendation of a Committee consisting of the following members:Chief Minister(Chairperson of the Committee)Leader of Opposition in Legislative Assembly; andA Cabinet Minister nominated by the Chief Minister. Role and responsibilities of the State Chief Information Commissioner:Power of general superintendence and direction and management of the affairs of SIC.The State Chief Information Commissioner shall be assisted by the Information Commissioners.He has the authority to exercise all the powers and do all acts which may be exercised or done by the SIC. Qualification of members: The State Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioner shall be persons of eminence in public life with wide knowledge and experience in law, science, technology, social service, management, journalism, mass media, or administration and governance. Prohibition on membership: The State Chief Information Commissioner and the Information Commissioners shall not: be an MP or MLA, orhold any other office of profit or connected with any political party or engage in any business or profession. Headquarters: The headquarters of SIC shall be at such place in the State as specified by the State Government by way of notification in the Official Gazette. However, the SIC may establish its office at another place in the State with the previous approval of the State Government. |
Term of Office and conditions of service | SECTION 13 Term of office of Chief Information Commissioner: As prescribed by the Central Government. Whether the Chief Information Commissioner is eligible for reappointment: No Chief Information Commissioner shall not hold office after attaining the age of 65 years. Term of office of Information Commissioners: As prescribed by the Central Government or till he attains the age of 65 years, whichever is earlier. Whether the Information Commissioner can be reappointed as an Information Commissioner: No. However, an Information Commissioner may be appointed as the Chief Information Commissioner, after vacation from his office. Tenure of the Information Commissioner appointed as the Chief Information Commissioner: Maximum 5 years in aggregate as the Information Commissioner and the Chief Information Commissioner. Resignation of members of Commission: The Chief Information Commissioner and the Information Commissioner(s) may resign from the office by writing under his hand addressed to the President. Section 13(6) provides for assistance to the Chief Information Officer and the Information Officers by way of officials required by them for the efficient performance of functions entrusted to them under the Act. | SECTION 16 Term of office of State Chief Information Commissioner: As prescribed by the Central Government. Whether the State Chief Information Commissioner is eligible for reappointment: No. No State Chief Information Commissioner shall hold office after he has attained the age of 65 years. Term of office of State Information Commissioners: As prescribed by Central Government or till he attains the age of 65 years, whichever is earlier. Whether a State Information Commissioner can be reappointed as a State Information Commissioner: No. However, he is eligible for being appointed as the State Chief Information Commissioner, after vacation from his office. Tenure of the Information Commissioner appointed as the State Chief Information Commissioner: Maximum 5 years in aggregate as the State Information Commissioner and the State Chief Information Commissioner. Resignation of members of Commission: The State Chief Information Commissioner and the State Information Commissioner(s) may resign from the office by writing under his hand addressed to the Governor. Section 16(6) provides for assistance to the State Chief Information Officer and the State Information Officers by way of officials required by them for the efficient performance of functions entrusted to them under the Act. |
Removal of members of Commission | SECTION 14 The power to order the removal from office of the Chief Information Commissioner or any Information Commissioner vests with the President under Section 14(1). Grounds for removal under Section 14(1): Proved misbehaviour or incapacity. Manner/process of removal: The President sends a reference to the Supreme Court for inquiry into the alleged misconduct. If after such inquiry, the Supreme Court comes to the conclusion that the charges of misbehaviour are proved and recommends the removal of such a member in its report, the President shall remove such member. Interim suspension: The President has the power to: suspend such member in respect of whom reference is made to Supreme Courtprohibit such aforesaid member from attending the office during enquiry, until the President has passed orders on receipt of the report of the Supreme Court on such reference. Disqualifications: Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the President of India has the power to remove the Chief Information Commissioner or the Information Commissioner if he is guilty of any of the following acts: Declaration of insolvency Conviction for an offence involving moral turpitudeEngagement in paid employment outside official dutiesInfirmity of mind or bodyAcquisition of such financial or other interest which might affect prejudicely his functions as such member | SECTION 17 The power to order the removal from office of the State Chief Information Commissioner or any State Information Commissioner vests with the Governor under Section 17(1). Grounds for removal under Section 17(1): Proved misbehaviour or incapacity. Manner/process of removal: The Governor sends a reference to the Supreme Court for inquiry into the alleged misconduct. If after such inquiry, the Supreme Court comes to the conclusion that the charges of misbehaviour are proved and recommends the removal of such a member in its report, the Governor shall remove such member. Interim suspension: The Governor has the power: to suspend such member in respect of whom reference is made to Supreme Court to prohibit such aforesaid member from attending the office during enquiry, until the Governor has passed orders on receipt of the report of the Supreme Court on such reference. Disqualifications: Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the Governor has the power to remove the State Chief Information Commissioner or the Information Commissioner if he is guilty of any of the following acts: Declaration of insolvency Conviction for an offence involving moral turpitudeEngagement in paid employment outside official dutiesInfirmity of mind or bodyAcquisition of such financial or other interest which might affect prejudicely his functions as such member |
Section 18(1) provides for the duty of the CIC/SIC to receive and inquire into a complaint from any person on the following grounds:
Section 18(2) provides for the power of the Commission to initiate an inquiry. The Commission is not bound to inquire into every complaint received by it. The CIC/SIC may initiate an inquiry if it is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for the same.
Section 18(3) states that while inquiring into any matter under Section 18, the CIC/SIC shall have the same powers as are vested in a civil court while trying a suit under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Those powers are:
The CIC/SIC has the power to summon and examine any record to which this Act applies and which is under the control of any public authority. Also, such records cannot be withheld from the Commission on any grounds.
The appeal has to be filed within 30 days from the expiry of the response period or the receipt of the decision of CPIO/SPIO. An appeal may be admitted after the expiry of 30 days if the First Appellate Authority is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by a sufficient cause from filing the appeal in time.
The appeal is to be filed to such officer who is senior in rank to the CPIO/SPIO in each public authority (First Appellate Authority).
This sub-section deals with the filing of appeals by the third party who has suffered an adverse order under Section 11. A third party aggrieved by the decision of the CPIO/SPIO to disclose third party information under Section 11 may prefer an appeal within 30 days from the date of the order to the first appellate authority.
Where the order against which the appeal has been filed pertains to information of a third party, the concerned Commission shall give a reasonable opportunity of being heard to that third party.
Section 19(5), provides that burden to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the CPIO/SPIO who denied the request.
The appeal under Section 19(1) or 19(2) has to be disposed of within 30 days of the receipt of the appeal. However, in exceptional circumstances, an extended period of a total of 45 days from the date of filing may be provided for reasons to be recorded in writing.
Section 19(7) states that the decision of the CIC/SIC shall be binding.
Section 19(8) provides for the power of the CIC/SIC to give the following orders in its decision:
The CIC/SIC shall give notice of its decision, including any right of appeal, to the complainant and the public authority.
While deciding a complaint or an appeal under the Act, the CIC/SIC has the power to impose penalties on the CPIO/SPIO for the deliberate violation of the provisions of the Act. Before any decision regarding imposition of penalty is taken, the concerned CPIO/SPIO shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The burden to prove that he acted in a reasonable and diligent manner lies on the concerned CPIO/SPIO only.
GROUNDS | PENALTY IMPOSED |
SECTION 20(1) Refusal to receive an application for information without reasonable cause. Information not furnished within the time limit prescribed under Section 7(1). Denied the request for information malafidely. Knowingly gave incorrect, incomplete, or misleading information. Destroyed the information requested by the applicant. Obstructed in any manner in furnishing the information | At the rate of Rs. 250 per day till the application is received or information is furnished. However, the total amount of penalty shall not exceed Rs. 25,000. |
SECTION 20(2) deals with the persistent default/failure of the CPIO/SPIO. Persistent default or failure of the CPIO/SPIO to receive an application for information or in providing information without any reasonable cause or malafidely denying the request for information or knowingly furnishing false, incomplete, or misleading information or destroying the information requested. | The commission shall recommend that disciplinary action be taken against the concerned CPIO/SPIO under the service rules applicable to him. |
The Right to Information Act, 2005 is a significant statutory measure for realisation of the citizen’s right to access of information. The Act mandates timely response to the citizen’s requests for government information. Citizens can file RTI applications for the public authorities under the Central Government by visiting https://rtionline.gov.in./ which is an initiative of the Department of Personnel and Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension. With regard to public authorities under the State Governments, an RTI application can be filed by visiting the RTI portal/website of the particular state.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.